skip to navigationskip to main content

Phone: 0141 248 7411 

Email:

Choosing a Service

Choosing an accountant that matches your needs

Sectors

Robb Ferguson provides specialist advice for...

icon-free-consultation

Free Initial Consultation

Understanding your accountancy requirements

Request a Callback

Lets talk at a more convenient time for you

Cameras, action and a happy tax ending

The Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS) is one of four venture capital schemes designed to allow certain types of small, higher-risk, unquoted trading companies to raise capital.

The schemes offer significant tax reliefs to individual investors buying new shares in the company. Availability of relief under the EIS was centre stage in a recent case at the tax tribunal brought by Inferno Films Ltd. Inferno, a film production company based in Wales, needed funding to make a psychological thriller, ‘The Ballad of Billy McCrae’. Spoiler alert: Inferno won.

In essence, the EIS offers several forms of relief. Chargeable gains on any asset can be deferred by making a qualifying share subscription. The investment itself can attract income tax relief and a capital gains tax exemption on gains made when the shares are disposed of. Income tax relief is particularly generous, at 30% on investments up to £1 million a year, and £2 million a year, if at least £1million of that is invested in knowledge-intensive companies.

A company must meet stringent conditions for relief to be available to an investor. For example, the investment must generally be made within seven years of the company’s first commercial sale, and the amount of capital raised in any 12-month period is limited to £5 million (£10 million for knowledge-intensive companies).

For Inferno, the condition under the spotlight was the risk to capital condition. This requires the company to use the money for growth and development, and stipulates that the investment should entail the risk of the investor losing more capital than they are likely to gain as a net return.

HMRC argued that Inferno failed here because it did not have ‘objectives to grow and develop its trade in the long term’. Specifically, it highlighted Inferno’s lack of employees and the fact that it subcontracted many of its activities. It suggested that Inferno was at best, a vehicle to provide finance for a series of individual projects. Inferno said its approach conformed to film industry norms and was the only realistic course of action for a small start-up venture. Its argument was upheld by the tribunal, which found that sufficient long-term aims did exist, as evidenced by its commitment to the Welsh film industry.

Whether you are an investor or a company looking for inward investment, we should be pleased to explain the venture capital schemes in more detail.

Not everything is equal – true. But maybe being equal is simply not good enough?

Our Philosophy

We’re a dedicated team which strives to provide success to our clients in regards to all their accountancy needs.

Meet our team